Leon
Trotsky: Economic Necessity Helps Those Who Help Themselves
Late
1929
[Writings
of Leon Trotsky. Vol 13, Supplement 1929-1933, New York 1979, p. 23
f.]
Dear
Friend:
The
American professor who asserted that in the epoch of War Communism
even Churchill would have carried out the policy Lenin did is
expressing a small grain of truth, which, however, quickly turns into
a crude falsehood if one concludes that Churchill could in general,
or even for a prolonged period, have taken Lenin’s place. That
“economic necessity” in the long run forges its own road is
indisputable. But only in the long run. It is also true that in the
process it not infrequently compels the empiricists to make a 180
degree tum. But does this mean that one can reject Marxist politics
and rely solely on economic necessity? No, it does not. First of all,
what could be called “economic necessity” in the present
instance? There are at least two kinds. There is the economic
necessity flowing from the situation created by the nationalization,
the monopoly of foreign trade, etc. This is the economic necessity of
socialist construction. But there exists an economic necessity
hostile to it, that of world capitalist development and its extension
into the USSR. Which of these two economic necessities will be the
stronger? For the coming years (but not in the last analysis), this
problem will be wholly resolved by politics,
i.e., by the science and art which provides the possibility of
orienting ourselves in the struggle between the two economic
necessities and of helping one of them against the other. The policy
of the right-centrist bloc from 1923 to 1928 was dictated by economic
necessity just as much as the current leftward turn that is not even
two years old. Where can one look for guarantees for the correct
development of the left turn? In bare economic necessity? But it has
already produced the various zigzags. In the left turn itself? But
precisely that turn was prompted not by bare economic necessity alone
but by the presence of a political grouping that knew that “economic
necessity helps those who help themselves.” I am talking about us.
The serious guarantee that politics will tomorrow serve socialist
economic necessity and not capitalist
'would be the capacity of the official party to include us in its
ranks just the way we are. There is no other political
criterion for us and there cannot be. All else is tricks, a game of
hide-and-seek with history, an attempt to replace the struggle for
definite ideas with a general inspectorate over the course of
development, or simply political cowardice and petty fraud.
Warm
greetings,
|