Leon
Trotsky: Letter to the International Secretariat
March
23, 1935
[Writings
of Leon Trotsky, Vol 7, 1934-1935, New York 1971, p. 210-218, title:
“The
Situation in the Stockholm Youth Bureau”]
To
the International Secretariat
Copies
to Members of the Plenum
Copy
to Comrade Held
Dear
Comrades:
The
situation with the Youth Bureau of Stockholm has become absolutely
intolerable The bureau transformed itself in fact into a private
affair of the SAP. At the conference of the IAG, the official
representative of the Stockholm Bureau attacked Comrades Sneevliet
and Schmidt, who defended the slogan of the Fourth International. And
this slogan, it must not be forgotten, is at the basis of the youth
organization to which we have given our adherence. The people of the
SAP continue their usual game. They sign some document in favor of
the new International; then they combat the policy that flows from it
In truth, we are the only enemies for the SAP to combat We do not
take it tragically as long as the SAP acts in its own name. But how
can we tolerate it when a representative of the Youth Bureau permits
himself to attack the qualified representatives of the program of the
Fourth International? Is it tolerable that the SAP, which does not
represent a great thing either ideologically or politically, should
climb on our back to combat us more easily?
The
leading position of the SAP in the Stockholm Bureau is explained by
the fact that since the youth conference de Kadt, taking advantage of
the imprisonment of Comrade Schmidt and usurping the representation
of the OSP, supported the SAP against us and assured it a leading
post And in turn, the young man of the SAP had utilized the mandate
of de Kadt to attack Schmidt because Schmidt did not want to betray
this program.
There
are still the Swedish [Socialist] youth. Unfortunately, we know them
very little. But what we know of the leading tendency of the party
does not inspire us with any confidence. I recall that the leaders of
the Swedish youth did not want Held, although a member of the bureau,
to reside in Stockholm so that he would not be able to penetrate
their organization. Thus, even before the beginning of the
collaboration, the leaders of the Swedish youth have shown a
ferocious hostility towards our tendency and our ideas. The SAP leans
on this hostility. That is natural. But how can we cover up and even
support this absolutely rotten combination? Comrade Held is at Oslo,
and the young man of the SAP comes to the Paris conference to attack
us. I ask myself, what does the SAP and particularly its youth
represent? They claim to have 5,000 members in Germany. This cannot
be checked. We have contact only with the clique of emigres, who are
opportunist maneuverists and not Marxists. In various countries they
hang on to bureaucratic cliques and to individuals of the type of de
Kadt to combat the program of the Fourth International.
I
do not want to make comparison of the ideological forces. As a
tendency, we have a tradition, a doctrine, literature and program.
The SAP has nothing. Let's take the quantitative side. The unified
Dutch party has its 5,000 members, which can be very well checked. As
far as I know, the majority of its members are youth.
Our
French section has developed great work among the youth. Its exact
influence can be measured by exact numbers at the last conference of
the "Entente of the Seine" (at this conference the SAP
people combated us by getting one-thirtieth of the members).
Our
Belgian youth already are developing important work in the JGS. The
youth organization of the WPUS represents a considerable force
already and is developing successfully. I pass over our youth in
Latin America, China, Sweden, Spain, etc. I cite only the facts that
can be checked.
And
the USSR? If one takes into consideration only the expulsions of the
" Trotskyites" for the last couple of months, we have the
right to affirm that our numerous forces there, without speaking of
the ideological and political traditions, are many times more
important than the forces of the SAP and the Swedish youth together.
What
interests, then, have we in covering up by our authority the work of
the SAP directed against the Fourth International and especially
against us as a tendency? I have reproached our youth for being too
indulgent and indifferent toward the youth conference. I must state
that the supineness still continues. They have created a sub-bureau
in Paris where our youth, which represents something serious, are
represented on an equal basis with B. Goldenberg, who represents
nothing but Menshevik confusion. They are even getting ready to edit
together with Goldenberg a pamphlet on the Second and Third
Internationals. The light-mindedness here surpasses all limits. We
have already signed a common document with the SAP that it has
betrayed and attacked. How can we criticize in a common document the
Second and Third Internationals if we are not in agreement on the
necessity of a Fourth? By such proceedings one makes ridiculous
questions of historic importance. Our youth need tempering, need
militancy suitable to our epoch. Where will they get this tempering
if they let themselves be terrorized by maneuverists of an
insignificant clique? This conduct will end up by compromising us
internationally and decomposing the cadres of our own youth.
The
vigorous intervention of the International Secretariat and of the
plenum seems absolutely imperative. Here are the first measures that
seem to be absolutely indispensable:
1.
All our youth sections must pronounce themselves clearly and
mercilessly on the attitude of the representative of the Stockholm
Bureau at the Paris conference; it is necessary to condemn him
officially and disavow him formally. The disavowment must be
published in all our organs.
2.
The Stockholm Bureau must be reorganized. The minimum
program of the organization demands that the bureau be completed by a
representative of the Dutch party and a representative of the French
section. The bureau of five must fix its place of residence and name
its secretariat
3.
The sub-bureau of Paris must be liquidated immediately.
If
the SAP or the Swedes are not in agreement, the worse for them. We
will find our task without august direction.
Given
the nefarious work that the SAP is now carrying on in France, it
would be absolutely criminal to drag out this affair and to continue
the ambiguity. I ask with the greatest insistence that you take up
this question as soon as possible.
Crux
[Leon Trotsky]