Leon
Trotsky: A Bolshevik-Leninist Declaration on Comrade Trotsky's
Journey
November
1932
[Writing
of Leon Trotsky, Vol. 4, 1932, New York 1973, p. 335-339]
1.
Journalists and politicians hostile to communism have tried to turn
against the Left Opposition the fact that Comrade Trotsky used the
visas of bourgeois and Social Democratic governments for his journey.
By the same logic one could reproach a Communist for traveling on a
capitalist ship.
2.
Communism does not "deny" democracy as a principle; still
less as a fact. All communism does is point out the limited
historical role of bourgeois democracy. During one era, it
facilitates the formation of proletarian organizations. But it is
incapable of solving social problems. The single example of
present-day Germany exhausts the question.
3.
In all the old parliamentary countries, bourgeois democracy is using
up what is left of its old capital. This applies particularly to the
right of asylum: it exists in today's Europe only for refugee
counterrevolutionaries, not for revolutionaries. The recent
experience concerning the length of Trotsky's stay in Denmark reveals
this with renewed force
4.
The fact that the Left Opposition had to avail itself of the
initiative of a Social Democratic student organization is explained
by one circumstance and one alone: the Stalinist apparatus has, for
the moment, made it impossible for authentic Bolshevik-Leninists to
speak at official meetings of the Communist Party. There is no need
to mention that Comrade Trotsky's speech from beginning to end was
devoted to the defense of the October Revolution and of the Soviet
Union.
5.
The Social Democratic government, i.e., the leftmost wing of
bourgeois democracy, authorized Trotsky's entry into Denmark only
because it felt it would be awkward to deny the request made by its
own students and young workers, and thus to reveal too crudely, over
a minor question, not only its anti-socialist but its antidemocratic
character as well.
As
soon, however, as the question arose of a simple extension
of the duration of the visa, this "democracy” showed that the
difference between it and the White Russian emigres, who demanded
that the visa be revoked, came down, all in all, to a matter of eight
days.
6.
Every regime must be judged first and foremost according to its own
rules.
The
regime of the proletarian dictatorship
cannot and does not wish to hold back from infringing the principles
and formal rules of democracy. It has to be judged from the
standpoint of its capacity to ensure the transition to a new society.
The
democratic regime,
on the other hand, must be judged from the standpoint of the extent
to which it allows the class struggle to develop within the framework
of democracy.
7.
The example of the Danish visa reveals the total insufficiency of
contemporary democracy, even in secondary and minor matters. Under
the pressure of world imperialist reaction, petty-bourgeois
democracy, even in relatively "peaceful" Denmark, is shown
to be incapable of maintaining its "reputation" by granting
the right of asylum to a revolutionary, if only for a few weeks. Can
one believe even for a moment, under these conditions, that democracy
will be able to prevent civil war with its worn-out principles and
formulas?
8.
The Stalinist faction has taken up a shameful position in the
struggle of class forces over the question of the visa. It acted with
all its power, through its diplomatic agents, to prevent the issuing
of the visa to Comrade Trotsky. Kobetsky in Denmark and Kollontai in
Sweden threatened economic and other reprisals. As long as the Social
Democracy still wavered on the question of the visa, the Stalinist
agencies maintained an alliance with the bourgeois section of the
coalition government, against the Social Democrats.
Aiding
the imperialist bourgeoisie in the shattering of what was left of the
right of asylum, the Stalinists ended up by directly and openly
denouncing, to the capitalist governments and their police forces,
the alleged holding of a "Trotskyist conference" in
Copenhagen.
9.
The furious campaign of vilification on the part of the Russian White
emigres and the influential imperialist press, with a thinly
disguised call for a terroristic attack against Comrade Trotsky; the
perfidy of the Social Democratic leaders in relation to their own
followers; and finally, the Stalinists' denouncing the
Bolshevik-Leninists to the European police — all this blends into
one inseparable whole. To complete the picture, one need only add
that an important element in the opposition to the right of asylum
was constituted by the Danish royal family and, linked with it, the
remnants of the Russian royal family.
10.
Before the world working class it has been shown once more with full
clarity that the Bolshevik-Leninists, the vanguard of the vanguard,
have been placed outside of the law by the rulers throughout the
world.
11.
The denunciation by the Stalinist bureaucracy through Tass is not
only shameful politically but also wrong as far as the facts are
concerned. There was no "Trotskyist conference" in
Copenhagen. Anyone who follows the press of the Left Opposition and
the course of the preparatory work it is engaged in knows that no
conference can be held any sooner than two or three months from now.
12.
Only this is true: Comrade Trotsky's friends and co-thinkers, alarmed
by world reaction's furious vilification, despite material
difficulties and obstacles, hastened to Copenhagen from countries
neighboring Denmark to lend him their assistance. The strong internal
bond among the Bolshevik-Leninists internationally was shown with
remarkable force. But the international conference remains as before
a task of the period ahead.